Arbitration Tips-N-Tools (TNT): Round 12

In this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about hiring a third party to assist with virtual hearings, especially in a digital world and faced with the complexities of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Round 12: When do you think it is wise to hire a third party to assist with virtual hearings – 3 indicia?

Responses:

A) Deborah Hylton

  1. Sole arbitrator is the key test. When I’m a sole arbitrator, I advise the parties as soon as videoconference hearings are raised that a tech advisor is required. The parties deserve my full attention on the case and deserve a decided trouble-shooter if issues arise.
  2. In an arbitration with numerous nonparty witnesses coming and going and privacy of non-party witness testifying, having someone other than the arbitrator handling the tech is key. Even in courthouses, there are bailiffs!
  3. One counsel can provide tech support in the absence of the other party’s objection. It’s tech support without third-party expense.

B) Marsha Ternus

  1. Arbitrator and attorneys are unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the technology to be used for hearing
  2. Attorneys unfamiliar or uncomfortable with the technology will be using multiple documents when questioning witnesses
  3. Complexity due to multiple parties and attorneys or large number of exhibits that will be used at hearing

C) Michael Pitton

  1. Hearings that involve several exhibits and require extensive testimony as to pertinent documents
  2. Proceedings when a record will be made
  3. Hearings with numerous witnesses, particularly those in different locations
author

Marsha Ternus

Background and Education. Marsha Ternus is a native of Iowa, growing up on a farm in northern Benton County. She received her bachelor’s degree with honors and high distinction, Phi Beta Kappa, from the University of Iowa in 1972. She earned her law degree with honors, Order of the Coif,…

author

Deborah Hylton

Deborah is an experienced arbitrator, mediator and conflict engagement specialist with practical business experience, legal skills and financial acumen. She is also has served as transactional lawyer, CEO, board chair, board member, restructuring officer and corporate governance expert. She is a problem-solver by nature and practice. Her background offers a…

author

Michael Pitton

Michael Pitton has been an experienced arbitrator since 1997, is AV-rated, admitted to practice in Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois, and is included in the nationwide Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers. He has also been a member of the adjunct faculty of the University of Iowa College of Law for more…

author

Amy Schmitz

Professor Amy Schmitz is the John Deaver Drinko-Baker & Hostetler Chair in Law at the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law. From 2016-2021 Professor Schmitz was the Elwood L. Thomas Missouri Endowed Professor of Law at the University of Missouri School of Law and the Center for Dispute Resolution.…

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

FAIR Act Published. It’s Pretty Much the Same as the Last Iteration

This article first appeared on the Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA) Blog, here. The recently-introduced Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal (FAIR) Act has been published and, as we suspected, it’s very similar to the...

By George Friedman
Category

Canada – Court of Appeal Upholds “Single Proceeding” Insolvency Model Over Recourse to Arbitration

This article was first published on the Arbitration Matters blog, here. In Mundo Media Ltd. (Re), 2022 ONCA 607, Court of Appeal for Ontario Justice Julie Thorburn dismissed a motion for...

By James Plotkin
Category

An Argument Against Using the Supreme Court Rules in UMP Arbitrations

The purpose of this exercise is to impart to the reader (the parties and their counsel) the advantage of employing all of the benefits of the new Arbitration Act, SBC...

By Kenneth Glasner

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X