International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) Rule Amendments Greenlight OArb

Mar 2021

Effective March 1, 2021, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) amended a number of its International Dispute Resolution Procedures. The amendments impact several areas of the ICDR arbitration rules: use of technology; decision-making and administrative powers; joinder and consolidation; efficiency; and ethical obligations. With respect to the use of technology, Article 22 and Article 26 (formerly Article 23) expressly allow for use of video, audio, or other electronic means (“Video”) for use throughout the hearing process. Article 26 specifically directs that all or part of a hearing may be held by Video, as long as it will not compromise the rights of any party to a fair process. This includes witness examination. Article E-9 also acknowledges online hearings under the expedited procedures. All told, these amendments clarify the allowance for online arbitration (“OArb”) – eschewing old notions requiring that hearings be in person.

Furthermore, Article 22 expressly requires that arbitrators discuss cybersecurity, privacy, and data protection with the parties in order to maintain an appropriate level of security. Article 32, formerly Article 29, also approves electronically signed orders and awards unless a physical signature is necessary according to law, party agreement, or tribunal discretion.

At the same time, the amendments clarify or expand the powers of the tribunal and the International Administrative Review Council (IARC). IARC thereby has the power to make decisions regarding arbitrator challenges, continuing service of an arbitrator, disputes regarding the number of arbitrators, the place of arbitration, and whether administrative filing requirements have been met.

For more, see Ann Ryan Robertson & Alan R. Crain, The 2021 ICDR International Dispute Resolution Procedures, AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1, 3 (Effective Mar. 1, 2021) available here.

author

Amy Schmitz

Professor Amy Schmitz joined the University of Missouri School of Law and the Center for Dispute Resolution as the Elwood L. Thomas Missouri Endowed Professor of Law in 2016. Previously she was a Professor at the University of Colorado School of Law for over 16 years. Prior to teaching, Professor…

Read these next

Category

The Tide Rises: Will Biden’s Blue Wave Wash Away Mandatory Arbitration?

This article first appeared on the Financial Institutions Law Alert, here. Congressional rumblings about outlawing mandatory arbitration clauses are relatively common, but they have not been successful. Ever since a...

By Joseph Calabrese
Category

The Arbitration Conversation No. 39: Arbitrator Moti Mironi

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Arbitrator Moti Mironi, Professor of Law at Haifa University and panel member of CAS (Court of Arbitration for Sport), WIPO, and...

By Mordehai Mironi, Amy Schmitz
Category

Amicus Briefs Are Coming in on Servotronics. And Oral Argument Is Set

This article first appeared in the weekly Securities Arbitration Alert of 22 July 2021 and is reposted here with permission. Amicus Briefs have begun to be filed in Servotronics, where...

By George Friedman

Find an Arbitrator