International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) Rule Amendments Greenlight OArb

Effective March 1, 2021, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) amended a number of its International Dispute Resolution Procedures. The amendments impact several areas of the ICDR arbitration rules: use of technology; decision-making and administrative powers; joinder and consolidation; efficiency; and ethical obligations. With respect to the use of technology, Article 22 and Article 26 (formerly Article 23) expressly allow for use of video, audio, or other electronic means (“Video”) for use throughout the hearing process. Article 26 specifically directs that all or part of a hearing may be held by Video, as long as it will not compromise the rights of any party to a fair process. This includes witness examination. Article E-9 also acknowledges online hearings under the expedited procedures. All told, these amendments clarify the allowance for online arbitration (“OArb”) – eschewing old notions requiring that hearings be in person.

Furthermore, Article 22 expressly requires that arbitrators discuss cybersecurity, privacy, and data protection with the parties in order to maintain an appropriate level of security. Article 32, formerly Article 29, also approves electronically signed orders and awards unless a physical signature is necessary according to law, party agreement, or tribunal discretion.

At the same time, the amendments clarify or expand the powers of the tribunal and the International Administrative Review Council (IARC). IARC thereby has the power to make decisions regarding arbitrator challenges, continuing service of an arbitrator, disputes regarding the number of arbitrators, the place of arbitration, and whether administrative filing requirements have been met.

For more, see Ann Ryan Robertson & Alan R. Crain, The 2021 ICDR International Dispute Resolution Procedures, AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1, 3 (Effective Mar. 1, 2021) available here.

author

Amy Schmitz

Professor Amy Schmitz joined the University of Missouri School of Law and the Center for Dispute Resolution as the Elwood L. Thomas Missouri Endowed Professor of Law in 2016. Previously she was a Professor at the University of Colorado School of Law for over 16 years. Prior to teaching, Professor…

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Separating the People from the Problem – Colin Rule and the Rise of Online Dispute Resolution

When the Apple II was released in 1977, it was among the first computers marketed and mass-produced for businesses and individuals alike. Apple would later adopt the slogan “The computer...

By Colin Rule
Category

Snapshot on Data Protection from the 2021 QMUL Survey on International Arbitration: Adapting Arbitration to a Changing World

The School of International Arbitration at Queen Mary University of London in collaboration with White & Case LLP prepared the “2021 International Arbitration Survey: Adapting arbitration to a changing world”...

By Cemre Kadioglu, Dr. Martin Beckmann
Category

Canada – Under New B.C. Act, Third Party May Apply to Arbitrator OR Court to Set Aside Subpoena Issued by Arbitrator

This article first appeared on the Arbitration Matters blog, here. In Terrace Community Forest LLP v Skeena Sawmills Ltd., 2021 BCSC 1522, Justice Milman dismissed an application brought by the petitioner, Terrace...

By Lisa C. Munro

Find an Arbitrator