International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) Rule Amendments Greenlight OArb

Mar 2021

Effective March 1, 2021, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) amended a number of its International Dispute Resolution Procedures. The amendments impact several areas of the ICDR arbitration rules: use of technology; decision-making and administrative powers; joinder and consolidation; efficiency; and ethical obligations. With respect to the use of technology, Article 22 and Article 26 (formerly Article 23) expressly allow for use of video, audio, or other electronic means (“Video”) for use throughout the hearing process. Article 26 specifically directs that all or part of a hearing may be held by Video, as long as it will not compromise the rights of any party to a fair process. This includes witness examination. Article E-9 also acknowledges online hearings under the expedited procedures. All told, these amendments clarify the allowance for online arbitration (“OArb”) – eschewing old notions requiring that hearings be in person.

Furthermore, Article 22 expressly requires that arbitrators discuss cybersecurity, privacy, and data protection with the parties in order to maintain an appropriate level of security. Article 32, formerly Article 29, also approves electronically signed orders and awards unless a physical signature is necessary according to law, party agreement, or tribunal discretion.

At the same time, the amendments clarify or expand the powers of the tribunal and the International Administrative Review Council (IARC). IARC thereby has the power to make decisions regarding arbitrator challenges, continuing service of an arbitrator, disputes regarding the number of arbitrators, the place of arbitration, and whether administrative filing requirements have been met.

For more, see Ann Ryan Robertson & Alan R. Crain, The 2021 ICDR International Dispute Resolution Procedures, AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR DISPUTE RESOLUTION 1, 3 (Effective Mar. 1, 2021) available here.

author

Amy Schmitz

Professor Amy Schmitz joined the University of Missouri School of Law and the Center for Dispute Resolution as the Elwood L. Thomas Missouri Endowed Professor of Law in 2016. Previously she was a Professor at the University of Colorado School of Law for over 16 years. Prior to teaching, Professor…

Featured Arbitrators

Results from: Virginia, United States
ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 5: Amy interviews Prof. Tom Stipanowich of the Pepperdine Caruso School of Law

In this episode of The Arbitration Conversation Amy Schmitz interviews Tom Stipanowich about mixed mode arbitration and his concept of "arbigotiation" which keeps the door open to negotiated or mediated...

By Tom Stipanowich, Amy Schmitz
Category

Canada – Commercial Dispute “Foundationally Different” from Investor-State Claim

This article first appeared on Urbas Arbitral, here. In lululemon athletica canada inc. v. Industrial Color Productions Inc., 2021 BCSC 15, Mr. Justice Gordon S. Funt determined that a standard of...

By Daniel Urbas
Category

Revised ICC Arbitration Rules

The International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) has released revised arbitration rules, which are expected to become effective from 1 January 2021 and apply to arbitration proceedings commenced after that date....

By Steven Finzio, Dharshini Prasad

Find an Arbitrator