Class actions plaintiffs and state enforcers have tried to use state price-gouging laws to hold online retailers accountable for prices set by third parties. It remains unclear, however, whether platforms will—or can, under the current legal frameworks—be held liable for price increases made by third-party vendors. One of the key cases that could shed some light on this issue, discussed last summer, has been put on hold, pending the completion of arbitration.
Read the complete story here.
This article was first published in the Arbitration Matters Blog, here. “Out here, due process is a bullet”, said John Wayne’s Col. Kirby in The Green Berets. Due process. Procedural fairness....
By Myriam SeersThis article first appeared on the Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA) blog, here. Margin debt in February grew to $814 million, up dramatically from a year ago. What this portends for...
By George FriedmanThis article was originally published on International Bar Association and on the Troutman Pepper Blog, here. It is republished here with permission. On 1 March 2021, the International Centre for Dispute...
By Albert Bates Jr., R. Zachary Torres-Fowler, Hailey Barnett
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.
