Class actions plaintiffs and state enforcers have tried to use state price-gouging laws to hold online retailers accountable for prices set by third parties. It remains unclear, however, whether platforms will—or can, under the current legal frameworks—be held liable for price increases made by third-party vendors. One of the key cases that could shed some light on this issue, discussed last summer, has been put on hold, pending the completion of arbitration.
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Karl Bayer, an Alternative Dispute Resolution practitioner with almost thirty years of experience in litigation, mediation, and arbitration. A long-time successful...
By Karl Bayer, Amy SchmitzIn this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools (TNT), Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about filing arbitration claims, especially in a digital world and faced with the...
By Theo Cheng, Daniel Urbas, George Friedman, DeAndra Roaché, Amy SchmitzThis article first appeared on Global Arbitration News by Baker McKenzie, here. With the emergence of the COVID-19 virus in early 2020, Switzerland along with many other countries introduced extensive...
By Valentina Hirsiger, Lukas Frommelt
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.