Class actions plaintiffs and state enforcers have tried to use state price-gouging laws to hold online retailers accountable for prices set by third parties. It remains unclear, however, whether platforms will—or can, under the current legal frameworks—be held liable for price increases made by third-party vendors. One of the key cases that could shed some light on this issue, discussed last summer, has been put on hold, pending the completion of arbitration.
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Hilary Mofsowitz, a South African Labor and Employment Arbitrator with the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) in South Africa....
By Hilary Mofsowitz, Amy SchmitzThis article first appeared on the Securities Arbitration Alert Blog, here. Years ago I penned a blog post on Independence Day and arbitration and updated it a few years ago....
By George FriedmanIn this episode of The Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Prof. Catharine Titi of the University of Paris Center for Law and Economics on investment treaty arbitration and UNCITRAL Working Group...
By Catharine Titi, Amy Schmitz
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.