Amazon to Get Battery Claims Arbitrated, Minus Would-Be Class

Another proposed class action against Amazon.com Inc. has fallen to the terms of use that consumers agree to with each purchase, now that a federal court in California has ruled that false-advertising claims about lithium-ion batteries must go to individual arbitration.

The agreement isn’t unconscionable because injunctive relief is available under it, Judge Stephen V. Wilson said for the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California in an order entered Tuesday. That’s sufficient under a recent development in California law, he said.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

UNCITRAL/ICSID Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in Internation Investment Disputes

It has just been announced that ICSID and UNCITRAL have released the third version of the Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in International Investment Disputes (see here). UNCITRAL and...

By Stacie Strong
Category

Badgerow v. Walters – Answering Vaden’s Questions and Limiting Its Application

Introduction             The Supreme Court’s decision in Vaden v. Discover Bank, 556 U.S. 49 (2009), held that district courts can “look through” a motion to compel arbitration to the underlying...

By Kristen Blankley
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 61: Former Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court Justice Marsha Ternus

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews former Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court Marsha Ternus. She was appointed to the Iowa Supreme Court in 1993 and...

By Marsha Ternus, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X