As part of your company’s onboarding process, all employees sign an agreement making it crystal clear that if there ever is any dispute between them and the company, that dispute must be decided by an arbitrator in arbitration and not by a judge or jury in a court of law. Your agreement then adds a belt to those suspenders by itemizing a wide variety of specific claims that would be covered by the agreement and, thereby, subject to arbitration. Your agreement even specifically includes a statement to the effect that employees have a right to consult with an attorney of their own choice before signing the document. Surely, then, when an employee brings a suit in a court of law, you will be able to dismiss the claim and compel arbitration, right? Well, as GrubHub learned earlier this year, that may not be the case.
Read the complete story here.
When COVID-19 hit, several checklists and webinars about virtual hearings began to circulate among arbitration practitioners. Some reported on limited anecdotal experiences with hearings held by video conference. None appeared...
By Julie Hopkins, Daniel UrbasIn this episode of The Arbitration Conversation Amy Schmitz interviews Tom Stipanowich about mixed mode arbitration and his concept of "arbigotiation" which keeps the door open to negotiated or mediated...
By Tom Stipanowich, Amy SchmitzThis article was first published on the Practical Law Arbitration Blog in two parts on 3 and 13 September 2021. Expedited arbitration gained currency as part of the arbitration community’s...
By Alexander Uff
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.