California federal district court has denied Ticketmaster’s motion to compel arbitration of Sherman Act antitrust claims based in large part on the bellwether procedures for mass arbitration claims set forth in the company’s arbitration clause.
The arbitration clause named New Era ADR as the arbitration administrator. Under New Era’s rules, if a matter qualifies for mass arbitration treatment, three bellwether arbitrations are selected—one by each side and one selected by the neutral. If no settlement is reached, one of the bellwethers can potentially become “Precedent” for resolving common issues of law and fact in subsequent cases. The court determined that “the application of Precedent in mass arbitrations … raises a host of issues.”…
Read the complete story here.
It has just been announced that ICSID and UNCITRAL have released the third version of the Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in International Investment Disputes (see here). UNCITRAL and...By Stacie Strong
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews former Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court Marsha Ternus. She was appointed to the Iowa Supreme Court in 1993 and...By Marsha Ternus, Amy Schmitz
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Santiago Dussan, Professor at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Cali, Colombia about Online Dispute Resolution in Latin America, and advances in...By Santiago Dussan Laverde, Amy Schmitz