California Federal Court Denies Arbitration Motion in Ticketmaster Case

California federal district court has denied Ticketmaster’s motion to compel arbitration of Sherman Act antitrust claims based in large part on the bellwether procedures for mass arbitration claims set forth in the company’s arbitration clause.

The arbitration clause named New Era ADR as the arbitration administrator.  Under New Era’s rules, if a matter qualifies for mass arbitration treatment, three bellwether arbitrations are selected—one by each side and one selected by the neutral.  If no settlement is reached, one of the bellwethers can potentially become “Precedent” for resolving common issues of law and fact in subsequent cases.  The court determined that “the application of Precedent in mass arbitrations … raises a host of issues.”…

 

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

How Companies Can Hedge Risk of Mass Arbitration

This article was first published on the Cooley LLP Blog, here. Mass arbitration is a recent trend where companies are hit with thousands of identical consumer or employment arbitration claims....

By Marc Suskin, Rachel Thorn
Category

Virtual Practice Makes Virtually Perfect – Practical Considerations for Virtual Hearings Identified through Simulations with Experienced Counsel and Arbitrators

When COVID-19 hit, several checklists and webinars about virtual hearings began to circulate among arbitration practitioners.  Some reported on limited anecdotal experiences with hearings held by video conference. None appeared...

By Julie Hopkins, Daniel Urbas
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 69: Stephen Anway, Partner and Co-Chair of IDR at Squire Patton Boggs

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Arbitrator Stephen Anway, global co-chair of Squire Patton Boggs’ International Dispute Resolution (IDR) Practice. In that role, he leads a team...

By Stephen P. Anway, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator