California Federal Court Rejects Unconscionability Claims, Enforces Delegation Clauses……

Two former Aon employees sued Aon, claiming restrictive covenants in agreements they entered into with the company were void, illegal, and unenforceable. Aon moved to compel arbitration per arbitration provisions in the relevant contracts. The plaintiffs argued that the arbitration provisions were both procedurally and substantively unconscionable, and thus unenforceable. In response, Aon pointed to “delegation clauses” in the provisions, pursuant to which disputes about gateway arbitrability issues are to be decided by an arbitrator. The plaintiffs claimed the delegation clauses were also unconscionable, but the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California disagreed.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

Call for Participation in Questionnaire for the Cross-Institutional Task Force on Gender Diversity in Arbitral Appointments and Proceedings

Women who have served or are serving as arbitrators are invited to participate in a questionnaire regarding their experiences, with a deadline of 30 April. The project is an extension...

By Stacie Strong
Category

Multi-Contract Disputes and Arbitration: Minimising Time and Costs

This article was first published on the Practical Law Arbitration Blog on 1 April 2021, here. Where a number of disputes arise between the same parties under different contracts or...

By Stephanie Barrett
Category

Indian Supreme Court Confirms Enforceability of India-Seated Emergency Arbitration Awards

This article first appeared on Arbitration Notes by Herbert Smith Freehills, here. The Supreme Court of India (the “Court“) has recently handed down a significant judgment in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings...

By Andrew Cannon, Tomas Furlong, Madhu Krishnan

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X