California Federal Court Rejects Unconscionability Claims, Enforces Delegation Clauses……

Two former Aon employees sued Aon, claiming restrictive covenants in agreements they entered into with the company were void, illegal, and unenforceable. Aon moved to compel arbitration per arbitration provisions in the relevant contracts. The plaintiffs argued that the arbitration provisions were both procedurally and substantively unconscionable, and thus unenforceable. In response, Aon pointed to “delegation clauses” in the provisions, pursuant to which disputes about gateway arbitrability issues are to be decided by an arbitrator. The plaintiffs claimed the delegation clauses were also unconscionable, but the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California disagreed.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

View all

Read these next


Snapshot on Cybersecurity from the 2021 QMUL Survey on International Arbitration

Measuring the impact of the Covid-19 global pandemic in the International Arbitration field was not an easy task. However, it has been promptly targeted by Maria Fanou and Norah Gallagher...

By Cemre Kadioglu, Carolina Mauro, Wendy Gonzales

ICSID and UNCITRAL Release Version Two of the Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in International Investment Dispute

ICSID and UNCITRAL have just released an update to the draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in International Investment Disputes. This new version amends the original draft Code, which was published in...

By Stacie Strong

Arbitration Conversation No. 17: Arbitrator Bill McGrath of Davis McGrath in Chicago

In this episode of The Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Arbitrator Bill McGrath about motions in arbitration.

By Bill McGrath, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator