Court Confirms Arbitration Decision Concluding That Discrimination Claims Were Time-Barred

A federal district court recently confirmed an arbitration decision concluding that a disgruntled former employee’s discrimination and retaliation claims under Title VII were time-barred because the former employee did not initiate arbitration in a timely fashion.

Clare Anagonye, a financial adviser, filed a charge with the EEOC claiming she was constructively discharged and discriminated and retaliated against on the basis of her race, color, and gender in violation of Title VII. The EEOC dismissed the charge on January 19, 2018, and advised Anagonye of the 90-day limitation period for filing a civil action at that time……

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

Second Version of The Draft Code of Conduct: Hits and Misses

This article was first published in the Indian Review of International Arbitration (IRIArb) journal. For more information about the journal, see here. On April 19, 2021, the Second Version of...

By Abhisar Vidyarthi, Sikander Hyaat Khan
Category

A Look At AAA’s Special Pro Se Case Administration Unit

This article first appeared on the Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA) Blog, here. The American Arbitration Association (“AAA” or “Association”) in 2015 created a special unit of dedicated case administrators to...

By George Friedman
Category

Canada – Arbitration Remains Mandatory Despite Option Given to Only One Party to Waive Arbitration

This article first appeared in Urbas Arbitral, here. In Malcolm Drilling Company Inc. v. The Graham-Aecon Joint Venture, 2021 BCSC 1136, Madam Justice Shelley C. Fitzpatrick issued a stay of proceedings...

By Daniel Urbas

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X