Nonparty Lawrence Satz received an arbitral subpoena in a proceeding between International Seaway Trading Corp. and Target Corp. Satz was a former owner of Seaway. The subpoena — the second issued to Satz during the proceeding — sought documents and virtual deposition testimony about certain issues he had refused to discuss at his first deposition. Before the second deposition, Satz moved to quash the subpoena on three grounds, each of which was rejected.
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of The Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Myriam Seers, an experienced arbitrator and Vice-Chair of the ICC Canada Arbitration Committee. They discuss how technology tools can be leveraged...By Myriam Seers, Amy Schmitz
This blog post was originally published on the Practical Law Arbitration Blog and is reproduced with the permission of Thomson Reuters. There are various means open to a party to an arbitration to seek...By Paul Toms
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Deborah Hylton, Fellow of the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators. Deborah is admitted to the American Arbitration Association’s Panel of Arbitrators for...By Deborah Hylton, Amy Schmitz