Nonparty Lawrence Satz received an arbitral subpoena in a proceeding between International Seaway Trading Corp. and Target Corp. Satz was a former owner of Seaway. The subpoena — the second issued to Satz during the proceeding — sought documents and virtual deposition testimony about certain issues he had refused to discuss at his first deposition. Before the second deposition, Satz moved to quash the subpoena on three grounds, each of which was rejected.
Read the complete story here.
This week, UNCITRAL Working Group III will consider the Draft Arbitrator Code of Conduct. They will be looking at proposed Article 3(2)(a), pursuant to which the obligation to remain independent and...
By Katherine SimpsonThis article was first published on the Practical Law Arbitration Blog on 1 April 2021, here. Where a number of disputes arise between the same parties under different contracts or...
By Stephanie BarrettThis article first appeared on Securities Arbitration Alert, here. We entered 2021 with SCOTUS poised to again rule on delegation after hearing an oral argument late in 2020.[1] Later in the...
By George Friedman
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.