Domino’s Delivery Drivers Challenge Arbitration Clauses after Southwest Airlines Ruling

Over the past four decades, the Supreme Court has issued a long string of decisions interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act to provide extensive protection for arbitration agreements. This term, however, was more of a mixed bag. Although the court issued a number of opinions that were pro-arbitration, it also wrote two that cut against the common business practice. In Southwest Airlines v. Saxon, the court ruled that the airline could not force the supervisor of a ramp for loading cargo onto its airplanes into arbitration under the FAA because the act exempts any “class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce…

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Arbitration Tips-N-Tools (TNT): Round 20

In this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about the growing interest in education around arbitration, especially in a digital world, and...

By Imre Szalai, Steven Shapiro, Erin Archerd, Amy Schmitz
Category

International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) Rule Amendments Greenlight OArb

Effective March 1, 2021, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR) amended a number of its International Dispute Resolution Procedures. The amendments impact several areas of the ICDR arbitration rules:...

By Amy Schmitz
Category

California Court Enforces Clickwrap Agreement Containing Arbitration Clause with Delegation

This article was first published on the Securities Arbitration Alert blog. The Court in Jane Doe #1 (I.G.) v. Massage Envy Franchising, LLC, 2023 WL 8801517 (Cal. Ct. App. Dec. 20,...

By George Friedman

Find an Arbitrator