Domino’s Delivery Drivers Challenge Arbitration Clauses after Southwest Airlines Ruling

Over the past four decades, the Supreme Court has issued a long string of decisions interpreting the Federal Arbitration Act to provide extensive protection for arbitration agreements. This term, however, was more of a mixed bag. Although the court issued a number of opinions that were pro-arbitration, it also wrote two that cut against the common business practice. In Southwest Airlines v. Saxon, the court ruled that the airline could not force the supervisor of a ramp for loading cargo onto its airplanes into arbitration under the FAA because the act exempts any “class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce…

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

African Arbitration Association Launches The African Arbitration Atlas

The African Arbitration Association has just published the African Arbitration Atlas, which constitutes a free online resource including African arbitration and a directory of African international arbitrators. The atlas is interactive and...

By Stacie Strong
Category

New Town Elder Arbitration Rules

The effort to cut arbitration costs has led to the promulgation of a new tech-assisted model that David Rivkin refers to as the Town Elder Arbitration Rules, which are meant...

By Stacie Strong
Category

PRC Court Sets Aside Cryptocurrency Award on Public Interest Grounds

This article first appeared on Arbitration Notes by Herbert Smith Freehills, here. Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court has ordered that an arbitral award made by Shenzhen Arbitration Commission (also known as...

By Helen Tang, Anthony Crockett, Briana Young

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X