Vinod Kumar Dahiya was injured in late 1999 while on a ship en route to Louisiana. At the time, he was employed by Neptune Shipmanagement Services and assigned to a vessel with interests held by the remaining plaintiffs. An arbitration clause in Dahiya’s employment contract required arbitrating any dispute arising out of the contract in Singapore or India. Following a rollercoaster of litigation in Louisiana state and federal courts over the course of two decades, including a state court trial and judgment for Dahiya that was later reversed, the dispute was ultimately arbitrated in India…
Read the complete story here.
This article was first published on the Practical Law Arbitration Blog on 1 April 2021, here. Where a number of disputes arise between the same parties under different contracts or...
By Stephanie BarrettIn this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about the growing interest in education around arbitration, especially in a digital world, and...
By Imre Szalai, Steven Shapiro, Erin Archerd, Amy SchmitzIn this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about hiring a third party to assist with virtual hearings, especially in a digital...
By Marsha Ternus, Deborah Hylton, Michael Pitton, Amy Schmitz