The First Circuit Court of Appeals recently concluded that an app user had sufficient notice of and was bound by an arbitration clause in the app’s terms and conditions. The court rejected the user’s arguments that, among other things, she was not bound by the clause because she had to scroll down to see it. The court concluded that the user was bound by the arbitration clause.
Read the complete story here.
President Biden on March 3 signed into law the Ending Forced Arbitration of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment Act. It became effective immediately. This article explores the features of the new law,...By George Friedman
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Ronald Brand, the Chancellor Mark A. Nordenberg University Professor, and John E. Murray Faculty Scholar at the University of Pittsburgh School...By Ronald Brand, Amy Schmitz
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Stephen Kane, Founder and CEO of FairClaims.com, an ODR provider working with sharing economy & B2B marketplaces, insurance companies, construction companies,...By Stephen Kane, Amy Schmitz