The parties in a $238-million dispute over the construction of the third set of locks for the Panama Canal is raising issues concerning alleged conflicts of interest on the part of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) arbitrators in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case may resolve rarely litigated issues concerning whether arbitrators who sit on multiple arbitration panels together or who support the appointment of each other to lead arbitration panels have disabling conflicts of interest.
Read the complete story here.
This article was first published in the Indian Review of International Arbitration (IRIArb) journal. For more information about the journal, see here. On April 19, 2021, the Second Version of...
By Abhisar Vidyarthi, Sikander Hyaat KhanThis article was originally published on International Bar Association and on the Troutman Pepper Blog, here. It is republished here with permission. On 1 March 2021, the International Centre for Dispute...
By Albert Bates Jr., R. Zachary Torres-Fowler, Hailey BarnettThis article was first published in CPR Speaks, The Blog of the CPR Institute, here. The U.S. Supreme Court ruled this morning that employers may require their workers to arbitrate...
By Arjan Bir Singh Sodhi, Russ Bleemer
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.