The parties in a $238-million dispute over the construction of the third set of locks for the Panama Canal is raising issues concerning alleged conflicts of interest on the part of the International Chamber of Commerce (“ICC”) arbitrators in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida. The case may resolve rarely litigated issues concerning whether arbitrators who sit on multiple arbitration panels together or who support the appointment of each other to lead arbitration panels have disabling conflicts of interest.
Read the complete story here.
In this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about the biggest pitfalls of online arbitration (OArb), especially in a digital world and...
By Deborah Hylton, Marsha Ternus, Michael Pitton, Amy SchmitzIn this, the first episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Svetlana Gitman, Vice President of the Commercial Division at American Arbitration Association (AAA). Amy and Svetlana talked about how...
By Svetlana Gitman, Amy SchmitzIn this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. Guillermo Jose Garcia Sanchez from the Texas A&M School of Law. Guillermo teaches courses on arbitration and international petroleum transactions,...
By Guillermo Jose Garcia Sanchez, Amy Schmitz
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.
