A former vice president of a division within Oracle Corp. filed a demand for arbitration against Oracle, claiming that he was owed additional bonus compensation under the terms of his employment contract and the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law (MWPCL). After the parties conducted discovery and filed the equivalent of cross-motions for summary judgment briefing and oral argument in arbitration, the arbitrator ruled that the plaintiff was not due any additional compensation.
Read the complete story here.
This article first appeared in the Thomson Reuters Practical Law Arbitration Blog, here. A recently published report from the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), The Accuracy of Fact Witness Memory in International Arbitration,...
By James TurnerThe presence of arbitration clauses in franchise contracts is not a novelty[1]– on the contrary, it is a practice being used frequently in such type of contracts. But when such...
By Leonardo de Oliveira, Clotilde Jourdain-FortierIn this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about making online arbitration (OArb) more widely available, especially in light of tech disparities,...
By Oladeji Tiamiyu, Myriam Seers, Olof Heggemann, Amy Schmitz
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.