A former vice president of a division within Oracle Corp. filed a demand for arbitration against Oracle, claiming that he was owed additional bonus compensation under the terms of his employment contract and the Maryland Wage Payment and Collection Law (MWPCL). After the parties conducted discovery and filed the equivalent of cross-motions for summary judgment briefing and oral argument in arbitration, the arbitrator ruled that the plaintiff was not due any additional compensation.
Read the complete story here.
What is the internet’s current favorite buzzword? Metaverse. In simple terms, the metaverse is an interactive three-dimensional virtual world. The metaverse is a combination of the virtual reality, augmented reality,...
By Brittany Munn, Amy SchmitzIn this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Ludvig Hambraeus, Policy & Public Affairs Executive with the Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (CIArb) in London, UK. They talk about the...
By Ludvig Hambraeus, Amy SchmitzThis article first appeared on Global Arbitration News by Baker McKenzie, here. Certain arbitration rules, such as Article 22.1(vii) of the London Court of International Arbitration Rules (“LCIA Rules 2014”),...
By Nandakumar Ponniya, Richard Allen, Nicholas Tan
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.
