Settling a much-litigated issue, the Supreme Court of India recently decided that two Indian parties can choose a foreign (non-Indian) seat of arbitration. Some courts had previously held that at least one party had to be a non-Indian person or company for such a clause to be effective. The Court clarified the position and held that an award issued by an arbitral tribunal in such circumstances would be enforceable in India and that the parties could also seek interim relief in India……
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Lela Porter Love, a professor of law and director of the Kukin Program for Conflict Resolution at Benjamin N. Cardozo School...
By Lela Love, Amy SchmitzThis article was first published on the Arbitration Matters blog, here. In The 6th Line Mofos Limited v Stewart, 2022 ONSC 520, Justice Healey dismissed a summary judgment motion brought by parties...
By Lisa C. MunroIn this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about building rapport with parties during online arbitration (OArb), especially in a digital world,...
By Oladeji Tiamiyu, Myriam Seers, Olof Heggemann, Amy Schmitz
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.
