Settling a much-litigated issue, the Supreme Court of India recently decided that two Indian parties can choose a foreign (non-Indian) seat of arbitration. Some courts had previously held that at least one party had to be a non-Indian person or company for such a clause to be effective. The Court clarified the position and held that an award issued by an arbitral tribunal in such circumstances would be enforceable in India and that the parties could also seek interim relief in India……
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Graham Ross, Head Of International Marketing at Smartsettle Resolutions Inc. and Founder and President of TheMediationRoom.com. The discussion revolves around Smartsettle...
By Graham Ross, Amy SchmitzIn this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about advice for holding an in-person arbitration while following safe practices, especially in a...
By Deborah Hylton, Marsha Ternus, Michael Pitton, Amy SchmitzIn this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. Richard Frankel, Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Federal Litigation and Appeals Clinic at the Drexel University Thomas...
By Richard Frankel, Amy Schmitz
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.
