Maine Supreme Court Holds Uber Cannot Enforce Arbitration Clause in Its User Terms and Conditions…

The Supreme Court of Maine has affirmed an order denying Uber’s motion to compel arbitration of claims that it and its subsidiary violated the Maine Human Rights Act. The action was filed after an Uber driver refused to drive plaintiff Patricia Sarchi, who is blind, because of her guide dog. Uber moved to compel arbitration pursuant to the terms and conditions of its user agreement. The plaintiffs (Sarchi and the Maine Human Rights Commission) argued that the manner in which the terms were presented rendered them, and the arbitration agreement, unenforceable…

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Are We Seeing the Start of a Tectonic Shift on Mandatory PDAAs in the Financial Services Field?

This article first appeared on Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA), here. This is less a letter from the editor and more your editor’s musings, but I wonder whether we are seeing...

By George Friedman
Category

The Continued Rise Of The New York Convention And The Fall Of The “Bellefonte Cap.”

Another Circuit Court Holds That the New York Convention Pre-empts State Laws Prohibiting Arbitration of Insurance Disputes On August 12, 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit...

By Edward Lenci
Category

Arbitration Tips-N-Tools (TNT): Round 15

In this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about growth in arbitration in the pandemic, especially in a digital world and faced...

By Marsha Ternus, Deborah Hylton, Michael Pitton, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X