The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Kauders v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. SCJ-12883 recently held that Uber’s notification of its “terms and conditions” during the registration process for its app did not provide “reasonable notice” to its users of Uber’s terms. The Court found that consequently there was no valid contract between Uber and the users who had initiated legal remedies against it and that the arbitration proceedings which had taken place were improper.
Read the complete story here.
This article first appeared in the Securities Arbitration Alert Blog here. We reported in December that the Supreme Court had granted Certiorari in four cases involving arbitration. The Court has just set...By George Friedman
Just a few weeks ago, on March 3, 2022, President Joe Biden signed into law a bill that amends the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA) by ending forced arbitration in workplace...By Brittany Munn, Colin Rule
This article first appeared on Urbas Arbitral, here. In Abittan v. Wilcox, 2020 ONSC 6836, Mr. Justice Frederick L. Myers reiterated the “consequences” of agreeing to submit disputes to arbitration, limiting...By Daniel Urbas