The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court in Kauders v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. SCJ-12883 recently held that Uber’s notification of its “terms and conditions” during the registration process for its app did not provide “reasonable notice” to its users of Uber’s terms. The Court found that consequently there was no valid contract between Uber and the users who had initiated legal remedies against it and that the arbitration proceedings which had taken place were improper.
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Gary Born, Chair of the International Arbitration Practice Group at Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr LLP. Gary Born is widely...By Gary Born, Amy Schmitz
This article first appeared on Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA) blog, here. I’m again updating my 2016 blog post on the Presidents and arbitration. The material that follows about the past...By George Friedman
This article first appeared on Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA), here. The arbitration underlying a suit challenging a FINRA Panel’s authority to hold a virtual hearing over a broker’s objection has been...By George Friedman