In In Re Romanzi; Kenneth A. Nathan v. Fieger & Fieger, P.C., Nos. 20-2278/21-1004 (Mich. Ct. App. Apr. 8, 2022), the Michigan Court of Appeals affirmed that, where an arbitrators’ decision is challenged on brevity, the proper procedure is to remand the decision back to the arbitrators rather than vacate the award, and this action falls within the clarification-completion exception to functus officio.
Attorney Craig Romanzi’s employment terms at Fieger & Fieger (“the Firm”) entitled him to one-third of any future attorney’s fees for any case he brought to the firm. In 2014, Romanzi brought a case to the firm but quit his job less than a year later. Seven months after that, the case settled for $11.9 million, and the Firm was awarded $3.55 million in attorney’s fees. The Firm did not pay any of that sum to Romanzi…
Read the complete story here
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Wendy Gonzales, Founder of Cyberarb (the Initiative for Cybersecurity in International Arbitration) as well as Disputes & Litigation Counsel at ASUS...By Wendy Gonzales, Amy Schmitz
This article first appeared in the weekly Securities Arbitration Alert of 22 July 2021 and is reposted here with permission. Amicus Briefs have begun to be filed in Servotronics, where...By George Friedman
This article was first published on the Arbitration Matters blog, here. In Singh v Modgill, 2022 ABQB 369, Justice Feasby denied the Applicants’ application to set aside and for permission to...By Lisa C. Munro