Ninth Circuit Sends Alexa Surreptitious Recording Case to Arbitration – Tice v. Amazon

A plaintiff claiming Inc.’s voice-activated Alexa devices recorded her private conversations without authorization will have to arbitrate her “surreptitious recording” claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said in an unpublished ruling Friday.

In a fractured decision, the court held that insofar as the lower court decided the surreptitious recording claim wasn’t subject to arbitration because the allegation is “criminal in nature,” the district court was wrong.

Read the complete story, here.

For a detailed discussion of the decision, see here.

Featured Arbitrators

View all

Read these next


Arbitrators: Be Cautious When Sanctioning Attorneys

A Colorado appellate court recently held that arbitrators do not have the inherent power to sanction an attorney personally for misconduct.  See Herrera v. Santangelo Law Offices, P.C., No. 20CA2105,...

By Imre Szalai

Mandatory Arbitration in Investment Disputes? Registered Investment Advisers Get to Decide…

Most investors do not understand the difference between two types of financial advisors who they often rely on for investment advice. These are Registered Investment Advisers (“RIAs”) and broker-dealers.  A...

By Brittany Munn

Arbitration Conversation No. 30: Colin Rule, President, and CEO of &

In this special 30th episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Colin Rule, CEO of and, on the future of arbitration.

By Colin Rule, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator