Ninth Circuit Sends Alexa Surreptitious Recording Case to Arbitration – Tice v. Amazon

A plaintiff claiming Amazon.com Inc.’s voice-activated Alexa devices recorded her private conversations without authorization will have to arbitrate her “surreptitious recording” claim, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit said in an unpublished ruling Friday.

In a fractured decision, the court held that insofar as the lower court decided the surreptitious recording claim wasn’t subject to arbitration because the allegation is “criminal in nature,” the district court was wrong.

Read the complete story, here.

For a detailed discussion of the decision, see here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 68: Prof. Imre Szalai of Loyola University New Orleans

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Prof. Imre Szalai of Loyola University New Orleans, a nationally-known scholar regarding the Federal Arbitration Act, and his teaching interests and...

By Imre Szalai, Amy Schmitz
Category

A New Federal Arbitration Program Stumbles Out of the Gate

In 2020 Congress passed the "No Surprises Act" [i] (The "Act") to address the sometimes-abusive practice of Out-of-Network medical billing. The Act created a federal arbitration program to adjudicate disputes...

By David Berry
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 29: Jonathan Eades, Senior Legal Counsel, BC Attorney General

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Jonathan Eades, Senior Legal Counsel, British Columbia Office of the Attorney General, on Canadian arbitration law. https://youtu.be/AvnY_aQi7cM

By Jonathan Eades, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X