On February 19, 2021, the Ninth Circuit upheld a district court’s grant of a motion to compel arbitration in a putative class action lawsuit alleging violations of various California consumer protection statutes. The court rejected the Plaintiff’s argument that the Agreement was invalid under California law because its class action waiver prohibited her from seeking injunctive relief.
Read the complete story here.
This article first appeared on Ogletree Deakins insights, here. Mandatory arbitration clauses for employment disputes have received a great deal of attention in recent years. In the First Circuit, there...
By Rachel Mandel, Laurielle HoweThis article first appeared on Arbitration Notes by Herbert Smith Freehills, here. The Supreme Court of India (the “Court“) has recently handed down a significant judgment in Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings...
By Andrew Cannon, Tomas Furlong, Madhu KrishnanIn this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Ronald Brand, the Chancellor Mark A. Nordenberg University Professor, and John E. Murray Faculty Scholar at the University of Pittsburgh School...
By Ronald Brand, Amy Schmitz
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.