The Pennsylvania Superior Court recently invalidated Uber’s use of a mandatory arbitration clause in an online registration page for customers, ruling that the arbitration clause was unenforceable because it did not clearly inform customers that they were waiving their right to a jury trial. Chilutti v. Uber Technologies, Inc., No. 1023 EDA 2021 (Pa. Super. Ct. Oct. 12, 2022).
An Uber driver was transporting Ms. Chilutti home from a medical appointment when the vehicle made a sharp turn. Ms. Chilutti, who was wheelchair-bound, fell from her wheelchair and was injured. Ms. Chilutti and her husband sued Uber for negligence…
Read the complete story here.
In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Adriana Vaamonde, Exec Director, Centro de Arbitraje Cámara de Caracas. Adriana is a Legal Advisor in International Commercial Arbitration, Arbitrator, and...By Adriana Vaamonde Marcano, Amy Schmitz
This article first appeared on Urbas Arbitral, here. In Kore Meals LLC v. Freshii Development LLC, 2021 ONSC 3736, Mr. Justice M. Morgan provided guidance on how to make an offer...By Daniel Urbas