Restauranteur Stands on Principle and Prevails After Six Years of Litigation

After six years of litigation, the California Supreme Court denied review of a Court of Appeal decision that affirmed an arbitration award issued in favor of the employer in a hard-fought wrongful termination, associational discrimination and retaliation lawsuit brought by a former restaurant server. The primary issue was the scope of review of an arbitrator’s award by either the arbitrator or a trial court. The decision affirms that California courts should take a deferential approach to review final, binding arbitration awards and that arbitrators themselves are restricted in modifying their own awards once issued…

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

View all

Read these next


Déséquilibre and Arbitration Clauses in Subway Franchise Contracts in France

The presence of arbitration clauses in franchise contracts is not a novelty[1]– on the contrary, it is a practice being used frequently in such type of contracts. But when such...

By Leonardo de Oliveira, Clotilde Jourdain-Fortier

Arbitration Conversation No. 13: Prof. S.I. Strong of the University of Sydney

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. S.I. Strong of the University of Sydney about trust arbitration and new laws in New Zealand.

By Stacie Strong, Amy Schmitz

Five Lessons Learned From My First Virtual Arbitration—Including Be Sure to Wear Sunscreen

This article first eppared on the JAMS ADR Blog, here. I just finished my first virtual arbitration, which involved a multi-million-dollar dispute between a large medical system and an extensive...

By Adrienne Publicover

Find an Arbitrator