‘Robot lawyer’ DoNotPay Beats Lawsuit By Illinois Law Firm

A federal judge on Friday agreed to dismiss, for now, a lawsuit by a small Illinois law firm that accused artificial intelligence company DoNotPay of engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.

Chief U.S. District Judge Nancy Rosenstengel in East St. Louis, Illinois said in the decision that law firm MillerKing’s claims are not sufficient to give it legal standing to sue DoNotPay in federal court.

“This case pits real lawyers against a robot lawyer,” Rosenstengel said, finding that the real lawyers had not shown how they were harmed.

MillerKing in March sued DoNotPay, which says on its website that it uses artificial intelligence to help consumers “fight big corporations, protect your privacy, find hidden money, and beat bureaucracy.”

Read the full story here.

Featured Arbitrators

View all

Read these next


Supreme Court of Canada finds Uber Arbitration Clause is Unconscionable

This article first appeared on Global Arbitration News by Baker McKenzie, here. In Uber Technologies Inc. v. Heller, 2020 SCC 16 (“Uber v. Heller“) the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the Ontario Court...

By Christina Doria, Brittany Shales

The U.S. Supreme Court Finally Will Review (and May Bury) PAGA’s Anti-Arbitration Rule

This article was first published on Proskauer Blog, here. While the California Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld arbitration agreements with class action waivers (as they must under the Federal Arbitration...

By Anthony J. Oncidi, Philippe A. Lebel

Arbitration Conversation No. 82: Prof. Ronald Brand, University of Pittsburgh School of Law

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Ronald Brand, the Chancellor Mark A. Nordenberg University Professor, and John E. Murray Faculty Scholar at the University of Pittsburgh School...

By Ronald Brand, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator