A federal judge on Friday agreed to dismiss, for now, a lawsuit by a small Illinois law firm that accused artificial intelligence company DoNotPay of engaging in the unauthorized practice of law.
Chief U.S. District Judge Nancy Rosenstengel in East St. Louis, Illinois said in the decision that law firm MillerKing’s claims are not sufficient to give it legal standing to sue DoNotPay in federal court.
“This case pits real lawyers against a robot lawyer,” Rosenstengel said, finding that the real lawyers had not shown how they were harmed.
MillerKing in March sued DoNotPay, which says on its website that it uses artificial intelligence to help consumers “fight big corporations, protect your privacy, find hidden money, and beat bureaucracy.”
Read the full story here.
This article was first published on the Securities Arbitration Alert blog, here. Introduction Industry-sponsored arbitration has long been the only option for investors who have claims against their financial advisors...
By Courtney M. Werning, David Neuman, Jorge L. Riera, Michael S. EdmistonIn this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Hilary Mofsowitz, a South African Labor and Employment Arbitrator with the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) in South Africa....
By Hilary Mofsowitz, Amy SchmitzThis article was first published on the Employment Class Action Blog here. In a published June 22 opinion, the Eleventh Circuit laid out a clear test for the Federal Arbitration...
By John Lewis
With the purchase of a Featured Membership, you will be shown on the front page of Arbitrate.com to web site visitors from your city and region (“state” if you are in the USA). You may appear in more than one city/region by purchasing additional locations.
