Samsung Ordered to Pay Arbitration Fees for 36,000 Biometric Privacy Plaintiffs

The Chicago federal judge who just ordered Samsung Electronics to arbitrate Illinois biometric privacy breach claims by nearly 36,000 Samsung device owners is not the first judge to note the irony of compelling a corporate defendant to abide by the terms of the very contract it imposed on consumers.

But U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber is one of only a handful of judges – and apparently the first outside of California – to back up his order compelling arbitration with a ruling that the defendant must pay millions of dollars in arbitration fees to launch the cases…

Read the full story here.

Featured Arbitrators

View all

Read these next


Canada – Statute Gives Unintended Economic Incentives to Avoid Mandatory Arbitration

This article was first published on the Arbitration Matters blog, here. In Metropolitan Toronto Condominium Corporation No. 1171 v Rebeiro, 2022 ONSC 503, Justice Myers granted a stay of an application...

By Lisa C. Munro

Championing Diversity in Arbitration: An Interview with Dr. Katherine Simpson

Dr. Katherine Simpson, an arbitrator with a focus on international disputes, possesses a unique blend of expertise with her work extending beyond the arbitration room. She is also an educator,...

By Katherine Simpson, Damini Mohan

Article 12(9) of new ICC Rules: is party autonomy really being eroded?

First published on Thomson Reuters Practical Law Arbitration Blog, here. The principle of party autonomy is expressed and enshrined in section 34(1) of the English Arbitration Act 1996: the right of...

By Ruth Hosking

Find an Arbitrator