SDNY Compels Arbitration Pursuant to ADR Provision in Contract Governing Disputed Commercial Transaction

Applying the Federal Arbitration Act and recognizing that it “reflects a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements,” the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the defendant’s motion to compel arbitration, finding that the arbitration provision at issue was as expansive as similar clauses that the Second Circuit has previously described as the “paradigm of a broad clause establishing a presumption of arbitrability.”

Plaintiff Kuehne + Nagel Inc., a logistics service provider that arranges the transportation of freight, and defendant Baker Hughes were parties to a global air freight transportation contract, which included an alternative dispute resolution provision that applied “[i]n the event of any dispute between the Parties hereto arising from or relating to this contract…

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

View all

Read these next


Arbitration Tips-N-Tools (TNT): Round 16

In this round of Arbitration Tips-N-Tools, Professor Amy Schmitz asks some of the leading arbitration practitioners about advice for teachers of arbitration who are looking to connect students with practice,...

By Steven Shapiro, Imre Szalai, Erin Archerd, Amy Schmitz

Arbitration Conversation No. 80: Adriana Vaamonde, Exec Director, Centro de Arbitraje Cámara de Caracas

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Adriana Vaamonde, Exec Director, Centro de Arbitraje Cámara de Caracas. Adriana is a Legal Advisor in International Commercial Arbitration, Arbitrator, and...

By Adriana Vaamonde Marcano, Amy Schmitz

Separating the People from the Problem – Colin Rule and the Rise of Online Dispute Resolution

When the Apple II was released in 1977, it was among the first computers marketed and mass-produced for businesses and individuals alike. Apple would later adopt the slogan “The computer...

By Colin Rule

Find an Arbitrator