Singapore High Court Requires Third Party’s Express Written Consent to be Joined to Arbitration Under LCIA Rules

On 19 March 2021, the Singapore High Court issued an important decision on the concept of a “forced joinder” in CJD v CJE [2021] SGHC 61 (available here). A forced joinder refers to a third party consenting to be joined as a party to extant arbitration proceedings on the application of one of the arbitrants despite objections to the joinder raised by the other arbitrant(s). Accordingly, notwithstanding the impression given by the phrase, a forced joinder does not refer to forcing a third party to join an arbitration against its wishes. Various institutional rules provide for forced joinders,1 including Article 22.1(viii) of the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 (“LCIA Rules 2014”), which was the subject of the Singapore High Court’s decision.2

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 5: Amy interviews Prof. Tom Stipanowich of the Pepperdine Caruso School of Law

In this episode of The Arbitration Conversation Amy Schmitz interviews Tom Stipanowich about mixed mode arbitration and his concept of "arbigotiation" which keeps the door open to negotiated or mediated...

By Tom Stipanowich, Amy Schmitz
Category

Remedying a Slip in an Award

This blog was originally published on the Practical Law Arbitration blog on 18 May 2021. Practical Law is part of Thomson Reuters A new report by the Arbitration Committee of the NYC Bar attempts to...

By Michael Lampert
Category

Reminder: SCOTUS Hears Two of “Arbitration Final Four” Oral Arguments Next Week

Just a reminder that SCOTUS will be hearing oral arguments next week on two cases involving arbitration. We reported in December that the Supreme Court had granted Certiorari in four cases involving...

By George Friedman

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X