Singapore High Court Requires Third Party’s Express Written Consent to be Joined to Arbitration Under LCIA Rules

On 19 March 2021, the Singapore High Court issued an important decision on the concept of a “forced joinder” in CJD v CJE [2021] SGHC 61 (available here). A forced joinder refers to a third party consenting to be joined as a party to extant arbitration proceedings on the application of one of the arbitrants despite objections to the joinder raised by the other arbitrant(s). Accordingly, notwithstanding the impression given by the phrase, a forced joinder does not refer to forcing a third party to join an arbitration against its wishes. Various institutional rules provide for forced joinders,1 including Article 22.1(viii) of the London Court of International Arbitration Rules 2014 (“LCIA Rules 2014”), which was the subject of the Singapore High Court’s decision.2

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 32: Prof. Santiago Dussan, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana Cali

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Santiago Dussan, Professor at the Pontificia Universidad Javeriana in Cali, Colombia about Online Dispute Resolution in Latin America, and advances in...

By Santiago Dussan Laverde, Amy Schmitz
Category

Canada – Standard of Review: Set Aside for Applicant’s “Inability to Present his Case”

This article was first published on the Arbitration Matters blog, here. In Nelson v The Government of the United Mexican States, 2022 ONSC 1193, Justice Penny dismissed Nelson’s application to set...

By Lisa C. Munro
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 27: Prof. Rick Bales of Ohio Northern School of Law

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Prof. Rick Bales of Ohio Northern School of Law on labor arbitration in the time of COVID. https://youtu.be/-lmqqMQqA6Y

By Rick Bales, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X