Supreme Court Declines to Engage in the Interpretation of “Engaged in Commerce”

It is hornbook law that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) enforces pre-dispute arbitration agreements involving just a hint of interstate commerce. Section 1, however, has a carveout providing: “nothing herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” The limited exception contained in section 1 has created a circuit split on the standard to use when determining whether an employee falls under the exemption’s residual clause.[1] On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court, for the time being, refused to resolve the issue by denying Certiorari in Amazon.com, Inc. v. Rittman, No. 20-622.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

The Arbitration Conversation No. 36: Mirèze Philippe Special Counsel ICC International Court of Arbitration

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Mirèze Philippe, Special Counsel at the International Court of Arbitration, International Chamber of Commerce, on gender diversity in arbitration. https://youtu.be/6URk_FvjHX0

By Mirèze Philippe, Amy Schmitz
Category

Divided Ninth Circuit Ruling on California AB-51 FAA Preemption is also a Split Decision: Statute is Preempted in Part

This article first appeared on the Securities Arbitration Alert, here. A split Ninth Circuit has finally ruled on the validity of AB-51, which would restrict predispute arbitration clauses (“PDAA”) in...

By George Friedman
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 12: Arbitrator Katherine Haennicke from AAA

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Arbitrator Katherine Haennicke from the American Arbitration Association about pro se parties in arbitration. https://youtu.be/vYmj9pTWh1I

By Katherine Haennicke, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X