Supreme Court Declines to Engage in the Interpretation of “Engaged in Commerce”

It is hornbook law that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) enforces pre-dispute arbitration agreements involving just a hint of interstate commerce. Section 1, however, has a carveout providing: “nothing herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” The limited exception contained in section 1 has created a circuit split on the standard to use when determining whether an employee falls under the exemption’s residual clause.[1] On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court, for the time being, refused to resolve the issue by denying Certiorari in Amazon.com, Inc. v. Rittman, No. 20-622.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Canada – Why Arbitration Needs the Courts – And Vice Versa

In Benke v Loblaw Companies Limited, 2022 ABQB 461, Justice Feasby called for a “culture change” in the courts to “create an environment promoting timely and affordable access to the civil...

By Lisa C. Munro
Category

2020 Canadian Arbitration Year in Review

From January to December 2020, Daniel Urbas shared one hundred and fifty-five (155) notes on recent Canadian court decisions, highlighting the most current reasoning and practical applications of arbitral rules...

By Daniel Urbas
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 88: Prof. Steven Shapiro and Dr. Shaheeza Lalani

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. Steven Shapiro and Dr. Shaheeza Lalani. Prof. Shapiro has been an arbitrator since 1999. He has been a construction law...

By Shaheeza Lalani, Steven Shapiro, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator