Supreme Court Declines to Engage in the Interpretation of “Engaged in Commerce”

Apr 2021

It is hornbook law that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) enforces pre-dispute arbitration agreements involving just a hint of interstate commerce. Section 1, however, has a carveout providing: “nothing herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” The limited exception contained in section 1 has created a circuit split on the standard to use when determining whether an employee falls under the exemption’s residual clause.[1] On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court, for the time being, refused to resolve the issue by denying Certiorari in Amazon.com, Inc. v. Rittman, No. 20-622.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

Results from: Virginia, United States
ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

Prehearing Issues Raised by Virtual Hearings of FINRA Arbitrations

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) has made significant changes to the arbitration process in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 25, 2020, FINRA initially postponed all in-person arbitrations...

By Joel Everest, Josh Jones
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 51: Tanya Venter, Director of Tokiso Dispute Resolution in South Africa

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Tanya Venter advocate of the High Court and a member of the Johannesburg Bar. Previously the CEO of Tokiso, Tanya remains...

By Tanya Venter, Amy Schmitz
Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 8: Prof. Richard Frankel of Drexel University School of Law

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Prof. Richard Frankel, Associate Professor of Law and Director of the Federal Litigation and Appeals Clinic at the Drexel University Thomas...

By Richard Frankel, Amy Schmitz

Find an Arbitrator