Supreme Court Declines to Engage in the Interpretation of “Engaged in Commerce”

It is hornbook law that the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) enforces pre-dispute arbitration agreements involving just a hint of interstate commerce. Section 1, however, has a carveout providing: “nothing herein contained shall apply to contracts of employment of seamen, railroad employees, or any other class of workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce.” The limited exception contained in section 1 has created a circuit split on the standard to use when determining whether an employee falls under the exemption’s residual clause.[1] On February 22, 2021, the Supreme Court, for the time being, refused to resolve the issue by denying Certiorari in Amazon.com, Inc. v. Rittman, No. 20-622.

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

The Arbitration Conversation No.81: Erin Archerd, Assoc Prof of Law, Univ of Detroit Mercy School of Law

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation, Amy interviews Erin Archerd, Associate Professor of Law at the University of Detroit Mercy School of Law. Erin joined the Detroit Mercy Law...

By Erin Archerd, Amy Schmitz
Category

Reminder: SCOTUS Hears Two of “Arbitration Final Four” Oral Arguments Next Week

Just a reminder that SCOTUS will be hearing oral arguments next week on two cases involving arbitration. We reported in December that the Supreme Court had granted Certiorari in four cases involving...

By George Friedman
Category

Canada– Class Actions: Rules for Referral to Arbitration Should be Followed 

This article was first published in the Arbitration Matters Blog, here. In Vidéotron c. 9238-0831 Québec inc. (Caféier-Boustifo), 2023 QCCA 110, the Court of Appeal dismissed Vidéotron’s appeal and confirmed Justice...

By Marie-Claude Martel

Find an Arbitrator