Swiss Federal Supreme Court Confirms that Not the Tribunal’s Legal Reasoning, but Only…..

In its decision published 6 January 2021, the Swiss Federal Supreme Court (“SFSC”) dismissed a challenge because in its view, the arbitrator had not violated public policy by finding in favour of a company that refused to pay commissions under an agency contract obtained through fraudulent behaviour (case no. 4A_346/2020 (in French)).

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all
ad

Read these next

Category

The New ICC Arbitration Rules

This article first appeared on Morrison & Foerster Client Alerts, here. The International Chamber of Commerce (the ICC) has hit the ground running in the new year with its 2021 Arbitration...

By Chiraag Shah, Gemma Anderson, Pietro Grassi, Matthew Rodin
Category

Canada – ‘Only Logical to Modernize’ New York Convention ‘Agreement in Writing’ to Include Text/E-Mail Exchange

This article first appeared in Urbas Arbitral, here. In Parrish & Heimbecker Ltd. v. TSM Winny AG Ltd., 2020 SKQB 348, Mr. Justice Richard W. Elson held that the Convention on the...

By Daniel Urbas
Category

ICSID and UNCITRAL Release Version Two of the Draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in International Investment Dispute

ICSID and UNCITRAL have just released an update to the draft Code of Conduct for Adjudicators in International Investment Disputes. This new version amends the original draft Code, which was published in...

By Stacie Strong

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X