U.S. House Considers Limiting Mandatory Arbitration Agreements

Since the Supreme Court’s 2018 decision in Epic Systems v. Lewis, which deemed class action waivers in employment agreements permissible, employers have increasingly relied upon mandatory arbitration provisions to limit potential exposure to large damage awards in employment cases. This is especially true in the context of class and collective action cases. Last week, U.S. House Democrats reintroduced legislation that seeks to overrule Epic by prohibiting and invalidating employment agreements in which an employee promises not to join, litigate, or support any kind of joint, class, or collective claim relating to an employment dispute…

Read the complete story here.

Featured Arbitrators

ad
View all

Read these next

Category

Arbitration Conversation No. 70: Catherine Rogers, Founder, Arbitrator Intelligence

In this episode of the Arbitration Conversation Amy interviews Catherine A. Rogers, a scholar of international arbitration and professional ethics at Penn State Law, with a dual appointment as Professor...

By Catherine Rogers, Amy Schmitz
Category

Arbitrator “Intelligence” and the Mysterious Brown M&M

When Arbitrator Intelligence promised to increase transparency, accountability, and diversity in arbitrator selection, it was celebrated as a welcome innovation. Now separated from its academic backing, however, it might accomplish...

By Katherine Simpson
Category

FAIR Act Published. It’s Pretty Much the Same as the Last Iteration

This article first appeared on the Securities Arbitration Alert (SAA) Blog, here. The recently-introduced Forced Arbitration Injustice Repeal (FAIR) Act has been published and, as we suspected, it’s very similar to the...

By George Friedman

Find an Arbitrator

X
X
X