Uber Technologies Inc. failed to block a driver in California from suing in court on behalf of the state over whether he and other drivers were misclassified as independent contractors rather than employees and consequently were underpaid, a state appeals court ruled.
Both arguments the ride-sharing giant raised in its bid to reverse a lower court and to hold Jonathon Gregg to its view of the terms of the arbitration provisions he accepted when he entered its technology service agreement were barred by rulings in prior cases, the court said in an unpublished ruling.
Read the complete story here.
This article first appeared in Securities Arbitration Alert, here. Introduction In civil litigation, discovery is the process by which parties exchange information that is essential to the disposition of the...By Ksenia Matthews
This article was first published in the Arbitration Matters Blog, here. In Wang v. Luo, 2022 ONSC 5544, Justice LeMay, sitting as an Ontario Divisional Court judge, upheld the enforcement of...By James Plotkin
This article first appeared in the Securities Arbitration Alert Blog, here. AAA Award Data is updated quarterly by the American Arbitration Association. This analysis of the latest update is provided...By George Friedman